Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Cruelty to Animals and CIA Torture (Unrelated, but While We're on the Subject of Cruelty)

Torturing unfit cows in California. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN3021948220080130

CIA torturing the innocent all over the world too, guess the innocent are unfit:

The ACLU on the El-Masari Case - CIA Torture and the Supreme Court

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/rendition/32108prs20071009.html

"Ben Wizner, an ACLU staff attorney who argued El-Masri's case before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals last November. "By denying justice to an innocent victim of this country's anti-terror policies, the Court has provided the government with complete immunity for its shameful human rights and due process violations."

"The government during the last fifty years has repeatedly invoked the privilege to protect evidence from court review, and the Bush administration has used the privilege more often than previous administrations."

Read about the defining McCarthy-era case and what it has to do with now: http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2003/03/iaf031403.html

Can anyone say straw man folks? That's what the recent Supreme Court decision gives us on this one. They said, ok, no, cases can't be stopped in litigation because of the State Secrets Act but...guess what folks, good old GW Veto and the Executive Office of the President can step in and declare a more-a-torium on whatever, whenever they so choose.

Now, I'm aware, and you should be too, that there are reasons for things we do not and cannot understand. And State Secrets are very serious things, I am not disputing that. But the Bush Administration has used the privilege 3 times, as opposed to the 12 times total it has ever been used before.

Exhuming McCarthy?

From the Center for Victims of Torture website, (thanks to a friend for pointing this out to me):

"The president signed an executive order July 20 that prohibits torture and cruel and inhuman treatment. But the order leaves open for interpretation a continuation of the CIA's worst interrogation practices. And it does nothing to ban secret prisons or extraordinary rendition – a policy known as "outsourcing torture."

At the forefront on their site now, they are saying the Senate is getting ready to consider legislation to create one national standard for the interrogation and detention of prisoners. It would prohibit all U.S. personnel, including the CIA and, perhaps more importantly, interrogation contractors, from using cruel, inhumane and degrading torture as clearly specifed in the U.S. Army Field Manual and clearly now being ignored as the above case reflects.

Visit Center for Victims of Torture to contact your Senator and find out more: http://www.cvt.org/main.php

Yes, there is a War and yes, there are always prisoners of war and there are reasons for that but there was this thing called the Geneva Convention...and there's this little thing called a right to trial, and an attorney that used to be one of the primary tennants of the Democracy we're told we're defending...

4 comments:

Elizabeth Bissette said...

From my friend Barney, who sent this in an e-mail and pointed out some of the disturbing subject matter herein but requested that I cross post his comment:

"I have a friend who's sister was one of the folks who dressed up as a GITMO orange-suit prisoner along with about a dozen others who were part of a Very LARGE early January anti-war protest in Washington D.C.

Her party/group was protesting the lack of any agreed upon formalized way of treating the GITMO prisoners. They are in a perfect legal limbo with no court status and no appeals process to be had.

[disclaimer - I'm not suggesting that everyone we have at GITMO is innocent or should be released. I suspect we have black bagged some very bad guys. But treating them like Orwell's Ministry of Love inmates is no real solution is my ideological stance. It's not PRACTICAL to inter people with no legal recourse for 6 or more years is where I'm coming from.]

In any case, you are legally allowed to protest (with permits) at THE BASE of the Supreme Court steps. Place one foot ON those steps while protesting ANYTHING and you get to spend the day (and possibly the night or the weekend) in one of our capital's jails. If it's a holding cell it may be water and crackers for the first 24 hours, as some of her cell mates found out.

The purpose of this small protest-within-a-protest was to be arrested. They "toed" the steps, were promptly arrested and went peaceably. All of this was organized so that they could read a statement into the court record at their hearings siting the NAMES of the Gitmo prisoners they felt were being denied legal representation. It's an Amnesty International tactic to attempt to give legal status to the nameless GITMO detainees.

This woman who was arrested (and thus gave up about 4 days of her life) has a small child that she is still breast feeding and works for a shelter in the NYC area providing meals for the homeless.

In short, she has more heart and more balls than I do."

Barney said...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=78385948

Just to be clear, they'd arrest anyone protesting anything ON the steps. It's considered private government property. You can protest spring or come out in favor of puppies and you'll still get manacled. This is not any new Patriot Act thing. It's been like that probably since the time of the Sedition Act. But it was still a big deal for her to step up like that. I'm sure if you google a bit you can scare up some images of the arrests.

Elizabeth Bissette said...

I'll try to find it. Thanks for the clarification - it really is a huge deal that she did that. I'm surprised more people aren't speaking up - don't get it.

Barney said...

http://tinyurl.com/33b5nu

or;

http://angrywhitekid.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/supremecourtguantanamo.jpg

should get you to an image of the group of protesters I'm referring to.

- Barney